Skip to main content

It's painfully obvious why Jazz would take Darryn Peterson over Cameron Boozer

It has nothing to do with how their talent compares with one another, but rather their fit.
Apr 1, 2025; Brooklyn, NY, USA; McDonald's All American West guard Darryn Peterson (22) and McDonald's All American East forward Cameron Boozer (12) pose for photos after the game at Barclays Center. Mandatory Credit: Pamela Smith-Imagn Images
Apr 1, 2025; Brooklyn, NY, USA; McDonald's All American West guard Darryn Peterson (22) and McDonald's All American East forward Cameron Boozer (12) pose for photos after the game at Barclays Center. Mandatory Credit: Pamela Smith-Imagn Images | Pamela Smith-Imagn Images

The Utah Jazz are in an insanely luxurious position at the moment. They basically get to pick one of the three of AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson or Cameron Boozer on draft night, even though one of those three will be taken by the time they're up.

it's likely it will be between Peterson and Boozer when Utah is on the clock. It's actually hard to distinguish who will be the better player, but in the Jazz's case, it's painfully obvious why they will take Peterson and not Boozer: his fit.

CBS Sports' Adam Finkelstein harped on this in his latest mock draft, where he predicted Utah would take Peterson (which he acknowledged might not happen if Washington takes him instead of Dybantsa) while explaining why they would go with him over Boozer.

"I continue to maintain that if Peterson is on the board, he will be the pick at No. 2. It actually may be a relatively easy pick because Boozer just doesn't fit with Jaren Jackson and Lauri Markkanen on the roster. Conversely, Peterson is a very clean fit alongside Keyonte George in what should be Utah's backcourt of the future," Finkelstein wrote.

Just as a follow-up, this is nothing against Boozer because he may be the most NBA-ready among 2026's prospects. He may even wind up better than Peterson when it's all said and done, and even then, that shouldn't dissuade the Jazz from taking Peterson because he fits their needs indisputably better.

With Peterson, there simply aren't that many questions

If the Jazz took Peterson, the rationale would be pretty simple: the one spot on the roster that could use some help is their guard rotation. While not terrible, pairing Peterson with George would give them their most talented backcourt since John Stockton and Jeff Hornacek.

Sure, there'd be questions about who would start, but that's not a negative aspect about the roster until proven otherwise. Simply put, if you were a Jazz fan, you wouldn't have to talk yourself into Peterson like you would with Boozer.

With Boozer, there would be questions. For example, if the Jazz drafted him, how does he fit into their frontcourt, as Finkelstein mentioned? Also, drafting Boozer more or less confirms that Lauri Markkanen would be out of Utah in due time. Granted, we already know the clock is ticking there, but the Jazz don't need that elephant in the room to get any bigger.

The craziest part of this is that there is a solid chance they end up with neither, as Dybantsa isn't the runaway choice as the No. 1 pick. But if it comes to Peterson and Boozer, don't be surprised if Utah makes their pick pretty quickly without a second thought.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations