Utah Jazz: Three adjustments that must be made for Game 2
The Jazz need to eliminate second chance points
While watching Game 1, I found myself uttering on several occasions, âMan, the Jazz are just getting killed on the boards!â Looking back, the discrepancy wasnât nearly as bad as my âeye-testâ mind had originally calculated. OKC barely won the battle of the boards 46-42 and the offensive rebounds, where I thought Utah was especially outplayed, ended up being knotted at nine apiece.
Not only did both teams give up the same number of offensive rebounds, but the Jazz actually held the Thunder below their offensive rebounding season average of 12.5 per game.
So why did it feel so one-sided? Well, KSLâs Andy Larsen hit the nail on the head in his post-game âTriple Teamâ piece where he stated the following:
"What really hurt the Jazz was how the Thunder took advantage of those situations. Despite only having nine offensive rebounds, OKC scored 19 second-chance points. Thatâs obviously way too many, and the Jazz will need to do a better job of staying focused if the ball doesnât end up in their hands, maybe even helping down low to prevent those kinds of putbacks."
That, my friends, is exactly where the problem resided. The Jazz didnât necessarily do a bad job on the boards, but when they did give up a rebound, it often had a deadly effect. OKC maximized every offensive rebound they got to the tune of an astounding 19 points. In spite of Paul Georgeâs hot shooting or Russell Westbrookâs incredible performance, one could certainly argue that fact as the difference in the game.
If the Jazz had just shut down those offensive boards even further and eliminated those easy second chance opportunities, they may have very well been able to overcome the other offensive punches thrown by OKC. If theyâre going to find success in Game 2, theyâll need to do just that.
In the aforementioned KSL piece, Andy Larsen also pointed out that not only were the Thunder able to capitalize on offensive rebounds, but they turned several of their defensive rebounds into successful transition opportunities. In other words, while my impression while watching the game that the Jazz were getting âkilled on the boardsâ wasnât technically accurate, it was accurate in the aspect that the Thunder made nearly every rebound work towards their benefit in a big way.
Sure, any rebound is a good thing, but when youâre generating easy points off of said rebound â be it offensive or defensive â it suddenly becomes a much more beneficial stat.
Therefore, although it will certainly be easier said than done, the Jazz need to aim to not only âwin the battle of the boardsâ in terms of sheer rebounding quantity, but also aim to eliminate all second chance opportunities as well as prevent the Thunder from pushing the pace after missed shots.
Out-rebounding the Thunder would be a great step in the right direction, but if thatâs all Utah does, it simply wonât be enough.
Next: Utah Jazz: Thabo Sefolosha will be missed in series vs. OKC
As I mentioned the day after Utahâs Game 1 loss, while the defeat was discouraging, it wasnât all doom and gloom. The Jazz put up a better fight than much of the second half scoreboard indicated, and with a few minor tweaks here and there, they should be much better off in Game 2.
And those âminor tweaksâ most certainly include each aspect Iâve mentioned here â improved defense from Royce OâNeale, better defense from Ricky Rubio and the elimination of as many second chance points as possible.
Game 2 tips off on Wednesday at 6:00 PM MT at Chesapeake Energy Arena and on NBA TV.